top of page

US Pivot Back to Persian Gulf Represents Practical Issues



The recent talk of the United States putting armed military troops on commercial vessels in the Persian Gulf raises questions about the prudence of such a step in a moment characterised by shifting global dynamics and de-escalation initiatives. The current situation requires a more nuanced approach, especially in an area where Iran and Saudi Arabia have recently normalised relations and shown support for de-escalation.


The idea to place armed US military soldiers on commercial ships travelling through the Strait of Hormuz represents a substantial shift from past customs and reflects an expanding military presence by the United States in the Persian Gulf. Recent deployments of Navy ships, Marines, and fighter planes suggest otherwise, in spite of a stated goal to limit military participation in the Middle East and transfer attention to other regions including East Asia and the Pacific.


The shifting character of interactions inside the Persian Gulf is a crucial part of this issue. Long-time adversaries Saudi Arabia and Iran have recently moved towards de-escalation and normalisation. The enhanced relationships between Iran and the United Arab Emirates and the warming of ties with Saudi Arabia serve as examples of this change. Even smaller Arab nations like Oman, Kuwait, and Qatar have shown a desire to cooperate with Iran in a peaceful manner.


Additionally, the anticipated military deployment presents relevant practical issues. Commercial ships often operate in accordance with market dynamics and corporate decisions, taking into account factors like insurance costs and demand worldwide. Interfering with these actions would upset the natural order and would unintentionally put American forces in a position where they would face challenging navigational and operational problems. This also raises questions about the chain of command and decision-making power during crucial maritime situations.


The possibility of a spark that could start a bigger fight is one of the most urgent worries. It is impossible to overstate the possibility that events at sea between the United States and Iran could develop into more serious conflicts. There would probably be strong domestic political pressure to intensify any incident involving American forces, especially if there were any casualties.


This deployment is being thought about as a result of Iran's actions in intercepting or bothering oil ships that are passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Recognising Iran's policies and actions as reactive is vital, though. Iran frequently intercepts ships as a response to outside pressures, such as economic sanctions and efforts to limit its oil exports. A cycle of tit-for-tat activities in the region has resulted from the US policy to block Iranian oil exports, which has stressed international relations in addition to other regions.

Comments


bottom of page