top of page

Resolving Ukraine Crisis: An Examination of US Policy

The United States' attitude on choosing diplomacy over protracted combat will have significant ramifications for global stability, regional security, and the well-being of the Ukrainian people in the face of a persistent crisis in Ukraine and the general mood for continuing military backing.

Senior US officials are currently supporting the proxy war against Russia, but fresh revelations about their plans show a determination to supporting Ukraine even as its counteroffensive fails. There is a chance for de-escalation and a turn away from the disastrous course of protracted conflict with the potential movement towards dialogue.

US authorities are exhibiting an unshakeable determination to keep Ukraine involved in the fight, despite knowing the weaknesses in Ukraine's counteroffensive and the possibility that they won't be able to cut off Russia's land bridge to Crimea. This viewpoint is consistent with the idea that steadfast support is necessary to avoid any perception of weakness that would give Russian President Vladimir Putin more confidence.

The US's choice to put diplomatic efforts ahead of a protracted war could mark a significant change from its earlier policy of escalating the battle militarily. The US must realise the essential value of negotiation, both in terms of saving future casualties and in creating a long-term resolution to the problem, rather than further up its military engagement.

Ignatius draws attention to the fact that US authorities expect Ukraine to keep taking part through drone assaults on Russian soil and the likely deployment of cluster munitions. Even with these safeguards in mind, the move towards conversation reveals a rising awareness of the futility of an endless conflict.

The US government's support for strategic patience as a response to Putin's goals reveals a complex understanding of the mechanics of the conflict. The US must concede that relying just on military strength may not be sufficient to deliver a definitive triumph by acknowledging the possibility that Ukraine and its Western backers could outlive Russia's President. The time is now to acknowledge the significance of fortitude, diplomacy, and international cooperation as crucial tools in determining how the crisis will ultimately turn out.

The potential for long-term ramifications if communication is ignored further emphasises the significance of this change in strategy. Human lives and regional stability have already suffered greatly as a result of the current trajectory, which is characterised by high casualties and mental agony for both sides. It is becoming more and more urgent to pursue diplomatic solutions as the conflict appears to be headed through 2024 and beyond.

The decision to put dialogue first is in line with the expectations the world will have the United States as a leader in fostering peace and security. The US musty communicate its commitment to peaceful resolution and show its openness to consider other options for preserving world security by adopting a diplomatic off-ramp. This strategy might serve as a model for resolving other disputes.


bottom of page