top of page

Petro Cryptocurrency Risks: A Look at Venezuela's Failed Experiment



Venezuela's ambitious attempt to launch the petro cryptocurrency as a means to bypass US sanctions has come to a screeching halt after six years. Despite its grand unveiling and initial promises of transforming international financing, the petro failed to gain traction and found itself entangled in a web of corruption scandals.

 

President Nicolas Maduro launched the petro cryptocurrency in February 2018 with great fanfare, backed by Venezuela's vast petrol reserves and priced at $60 per unit. The intention behind this move was to alleviate the economic pressure imposed by Washington's economic sanctions on the nation. Maduro boldly proclaimed that the petro would open avenues for new forms of international financing.

 

However, the petro faced numerous challenges from the outset. Citizens struggled to understand how to use the cryptocurrency, and some risk rating bodies labeled it a "scam." Despite attempts to boost its adoption, such as making it mandatory for airlines to use petro for fuel payments and for citizens to pay for state services, the cryptocurrency remained confined to a limited scope of state operations.

 

The death knell for the petro came in the form of a corruption scandal that erupted last year. Irregularities in the management of funds from oil operations conducted with crypto assets led to the resignation of the once-powerful petroleum minister, Tareck El Aissami, and the detention of numerous officials, including top management of the Sunacrip crypto regulator.

 

This corruption scandal not only damaged the credibility of the petro but also raised serious questions about the transparency and integrity of the entire cryptocurrency initiative. The government's attempt to force banks to present balances in both bolivars and petros further fueled skepticism surrounding the petro's legitimacy.

 

One of the key reasons for the petro's demise was its limited adoption. While traffic fines were handed out in petros, it was impractical for citizens to use the cryptocurrency for payment. The Patria Platform, primarily used for government subsidies, facilitated petro-to-bolivar exchanges only through an auction system, limiting its accessibility.

 

The international community's skepticism towards the petro also played a crucial role. With accusations of being a "scam" and lacking a clear use case, the petro failed to gain the trust of both domestic and international investors.

 

Comments


bottom of page