top of page

Is ICC Carrying Out Its Mandate?

Updated: Jun 1

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has recently made headlines with its decision to seek arrest warrants for both Hamas and Israeli leaders in light of the ongoing crisis in Gaza. This move has sparked debate and controversy regarding the effectiveness and fairness of the ICC in carrying out its mandate.


The ICC's primary purpose is to prosecute individuals responsible for the most serious international crimes, including genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. It aims to hold accountable those who commit such atrocities and uphold the principles of international law.


One notable case is the ICC's declaration that Russian President Vladimir Putin had violated international law and committed war crimes in Ukraine. The issuance of arrest warrants for Putin and a senior official highlighted the ICC's commitment to holding even powerful leaders accountable for their actions.


In the latest development, the ICC prosecutor has requested arrest warrants for three top Hamas leaders, including Yahya Sinwar, as well as Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Gallant. The charges against these individuals include war crimes such as the use of starvation as a method of war and intentional attacks against the civilian population.


While some observers have criticized the ICC's decision, arguing that it unfairly targets democratically elected leaders like Netanyahu, they emphasize that the ICC is applying established standards of international law to assess the actions of all parties involved. The underscores that accountability for war crimes should apply universally, regardless of political affiliations or democratic mandates.


The actions of all parties involved may constitute war crimes. This clearly stresses the importance of holding accountable those responsible for such violations of international law to prevent further escalation of conflict and protect civilian populations.


bottom of page