top of page

India-Mideast-Europe Corridor: A Counter to China's BRI?

In a significant move aimed at reshaping global connectivity and trade dynamics, leaders from India, Europe, and the Middle East have unveiled the ambitious India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).

The project was announced on the sidelines of the G20 leaders' summit in New Delhi and has the potential to act as a formidable countermeasure to China's expansive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

The IMEC is a grand transnational rail and shipping route that spans across two continents, designed to enhance economic development by bolstering connectivity and economic integration between Asia, the Arabian Gulf, and Europe. It encompasses two separate corridors - the eastern corridor linking India to the Arabian Gulf and the northern corridor linking the Persian Gulf to Europe.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in announcing the project, emphasized its potential to provide sustainable development for the entire world. European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen further underscored the corridor's significance, stating that it would create the most direct connection to date between India, the Persian Gulf, and Europe, making trade 40% faster.

The corridor includes various components such as a rail link, electricity cable, hydrogen pipeline, and high-speed data cable, all aimed at creating a green and digital bridge across continents and civilizations.

In terms of objectives, both the IMEC and China's BRI share similarities, albeit with differences in scale. The IMEC seeks to provide a viable alternative to the BRI, which has raised concerns about Beijing's extensive influence across multiple continents.

The G7 leaders pledged to collectively mobilize $600 billion by 2027 to counter the BRI, highlighting the global concerns surrounding China's ambitious initiative. While China has signed BRI cooperation documents with numerous countries and organizations, the IMEC provides an alternative vision that emphasizes viability and funding from multiple sources, including public-private partnerships.

Furthermore, China's BRI has faced criticism for its lack of transparency and environmental concerns, leading some countries like Italy to signal their intent to withdraw from the initiative. Experts analyzing the IMEC project believe that it aligns with the geopolitical goals of the US and Europe, aiming to compete with China's global infrastructure initiatives while boosting their influence in the Middle East.

They argue that India's lack of direct access to central Asia has led it to collaborate with other global players to advance its infrastructure projects. However, the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East and West Asia is complex and not easily reducible to zero-sum calculations.

However, the IMEC and the BRI are fundamentally different in character, with the IMEC focusing on viability through diverse funding sources. Over 70% of the infrastructure for the project is already in place, making it a geopolitical game changer that will benefit Southeast Asian countries once completed.


bottom of page