top of page

Global Security: Collaborating with All Nations Against Terrorism

The recent decision by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to remove Cuba from the State Department’s list of uncooperative countries against violent groups has sparked discussions about effective strategies in this fight.


While some may view this move skeptically, the best way forward for the United States and other Western countries still is to engage in comprehensive collaboration with all nations, including those traditionally considered adversaries like Iran and Syria.


Cuba’s removal from the list signifies a significant shift in diplomatic relations. Previously labeled as “not fully cooperating,” Cuba’s renewed engagement with US law enforcement on counterterrorism efforts demonstrates progress. By acknowledging this positive change, the State Department recognizes the potential for constructive dialogue and joint action.


Why Inclusive Cooperation Matters

Terrorism knows no borders. To effectively combat it, intelligence-sharing and resource pooling are essential. By working with all nations, including those with strained relations, Western countries can access critical information and enhance their capabilities.


Iran and Syria, despite their geopolitical complexities, possess valuable insights into regional dynamics. Their cooperation could provide crucial data on extremist networks, funding sources, and recruitment patterns.


Terrorism often thrives in regions plagued by instability, poverty, and political turmoil. Collaborating with nations like Iran and Syria allows for a holistic approach to addressing root causes. Joint efforts can focus on socioeconomic development, education, and countering extremist ideologies. By involving all stakeholders, we can create lasting solutions.


Terrorist networks operate across borders, exploiting gaps in international cooperation. Isolating certain nations only strengthens these networks. By engaging with countries like Iran and Syria, Western nations can disrupt transnational networks more effectively. Coordinated efforts can dismantle financing channels, track foreign fighters, and prevent attacks.


Challenges and Mitigations

Critics argue that collaboration with Iran and Syria legitimizes their regimes. However, pragmatism should guide the approach. Diplomatic engagement doesn’t imply endorsement; it’s a strategic necessity. Western countries can maintain their principles while pursuing shared goals.


Some nations on the State Department’s list may have questionable human rights records. Striking a balance between security imperatives and human rights protections is crucial. Robust monitoring mechanisms and conditional cooperation can ensure accountability.


In the fight against terrorism, exclusionary tactics limit international effectiveness. By embracing a comprehensive approach that involves all nations, Western governments can strengthen global security.

The removal of Cuba from the list serves as a positive precedent. The way ahead is to seize this opportunity to build bridges, share knowledge, and collectively safeguard our world against violent extremism.


bottom of page