top of page

Controlling High Incomes: An Alternative to Taxing Them

In the ongoing debate over taxation and wealth distribution, a compelling argument emerges: rather than relying solely on high taxes to redistribute wealth, there's a need to explore the control of high incomes as a viable alternative. This perspective gains traction as recent events, such as Jeff Bezos' relocation to Miami to evade taxes, underscore the limitations of relying solely on tax policies to address income inequality.


The relocation of Jeff Bezos from Washington to Florida highlights the significant impact of tax policies on the behavior of the ultra-rich. Bezos' move was largely motivated by Washington's implementation of a new 7 percent tax on long-term capital gains, prompting him to seek residency in a state with no income tax or capital gains levy. This maneuver allowed Bezos to save billions of dollars in taxes, shedding light on the inadequacies of tax policies in addressing wealth disparities.


Critics of high taxes on the wealthy often argue that such measures incentivize the rich to relocate to jurisdictions with more favorable tax regimes. However, research suggests that the actual evidence does not support this narrative. Recent analysis of tax data reveals that migration among the wealthy is minimal, particularly among those in advanced career stages. The ties formed through business and social connections tend to anchor the affluent in their current locations, making them less responsive to marginal differences in tax rates.


Furthermore, the luxury real estate market provides compelling evidence that high taxes do not deter the wealthy from residing in high-tax jurisdictions. The robust sales of residential properties in the $20 million-plus price range in New York City, despite its relatively high tax rates, underscore the resilience of the affluent population in such areas.


The focus should shift from solely taxing high incomes to implementing measures that control excessive wealth accumulation. This can be achieved through various means, including progressive taxation, caps on executive compensation, and measures to curb income inequality within corporations. The idea is to ensure a more equitable distribution of wealth while mitigating the adverse effects of wealth concentration, such as housing unaffordability and social inequality.


Controlling high incomes aligns with the principles of economic justice and social responsibility. It acknowledges the societal contributions of all members and seeks to promote a more inclusive and sustainable economy. Rather than viewing taxation as the sole mechanism for wealth redistribution, policymakers should explore comprehensive strategies that address the root causes of income inequality and promote economic fairness for all.


bottom of page