top of page

China’s Support for Russian Aggression: A Call to Uphold Intl Law



As the conflict between Russia and Ukraine rages on, the international community finds itself at a critical juncture, urging all stakeholders to act in accordance with established norms of international law and diplomacy.

 

Amidst the escalating tensions, one key player stands under scrutiny: China. The recent call by the United States for China to refrain from supporting Russia in its war against Ukraine underscores the urgent need for Beijing to reassess its stance and align its actions with international legal principles.

 

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken's visit to China, with the explicit purpose of dissuading Beijing from aiding Russia's aggression, highlights the gravity of the situation. Blinken's revelation that China serves as the largest supplier of dual-use goods to Russia's defense-industrial base is a stark reminder of China's significant role in sustaining Russia's military capabilities. These dual-use goods, including machinery and microelectronics, directly contribute to Russia's capacity to wage war against Ukraine.

 

The assertion that "Russia would struggle to sustain its assault on Ukraine without China’s support" underscores the crucial leverage that China holds in this conflict. By continuing to provide vital resources to Russia, China effectively becomes complicit in prolonging the suffering of the Ukrainian people and perpetuating the violation of Ukraine's sovereignty.

 

Furthermore, Blinken's warning of potential sanctions against China for its support of Russia serves as a clear signal of the consequences that Beijing may face if it persists in its current course of action. The imposition of sanctions on over 100 Chinese entities and the threat of further punitive measures demonstrate the seriousness with which the US views China's role in the conflict.

 

Despite China's official stance of neutrality and nominal support for Ukraine's sovereignty, its actions speak louder than words. While Beijing may publicly advocate for peaceful resolutions and diplomatic dialogue, its continued trade relations with Russia directly undermine these efforts. The supply of dual-use goods, coupled with China's insistence on Moscow's presence in peace talks, raises questions about China's true intentions and commitment to upholding international law.

 

In light of these developments, it is imperative for China to reassess its position and cease all forms of support for Russia in the Ukraine conflict. Upholding the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference in the internal affairs of other states is not only a moral imperative but also a legal obligation under international law.

 

By aligning its actions with these principles, China can demonstrate its commitment to promoting peace, stability, and respect for the rule of law on the global stage. Moreover, it can avoid the risk of further escalating tensions with the US and other Western powers, which could have far-reaching economic and geopolitical ramifications.

 

Comments


bottom of page