top of page

Can Europe Defend Itself If US Pulls Out of NATO?

In light of US presidential candidate Donald Trump’s recent comments on NATO, the question of Europe’s ability to defend itself independently has become increasingly urgent.

The possibility of the US abandoning its allies has raised concerns, prompting European leaders to consider alternative defense strategies. However, the reality is stark: Europe fundamentally relies on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), an alliance that must be led by the United States, for its protection1.


European NATO members (along with their trans-Atlantic partners, the US and Canada) have increased defense spending in response to Russian actions, such as the annexation of Crimea and the invasion of Ukraine. While 18 countries are on track to meet or surpass the agreed-upon 2 percent of GDP spending on defense, the total financial contribution still falls short without America’s involvement.


Of the $1.3 trillion spent collectively by the 32 NATO nations on defense, more than half - $860 billion - is contributed by the United States. Even when accounting for global military missions, a significant portion of US defense spending indirectly benefits Europe.


NATO’s strength lies not only in financial contributions but also in its organizational structure. The alliance is not merely a loose assembly of nations; it is a unified force explicitly led by the US.

The Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), a US general officer, oversees NATO’s military operations. This includes planning, resource allocation, training, and overall command. In times of war, SACEUR would lead the entire effort to preserve or restore the security of Alliance territory.


Indeed, creating an independent European defense force would be a monumental task. Such an endeavor would take 10–15 years and require substantial funding beyond the famous 2 percent of GDP commitment. The challenge lies not only in financial resources but also in organizing a cohesive force capable of strategic planning, coordination, and unified action.


The challenge extends beyond finances to building a robust military structure too. The American nuclear umbrella remains a critical component of European security. Any shift away from it necessitates careful consideration and long-term planning.

Europe must grapple with the delicate balance between autonomy and strategic interdependence. The path forward requires thoughtful navigation, weighing independence against strategic imperatives.




bottom of page